What you need to know about the Army Corps' studies of Twin Cities locks and dams

Tour participants overlooking Ford dam

What will happen to metro locks and dams? Here's a rundown of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers disposition study process and timeline, as well as the scenarios under consideration and ways you can shape the river's future. (Photo by FMR)

Ready to tell the Army Corps your questions and comments about the future of the Mississippi River? Use this comment form by December 18th to make sure your voice is heard.

When Congress closed the Upper St. Anthony Falls lock in 2015, all three of the Minneapolis and St. Paul locks stopped serving commercial barge traffic. And since that was the primary purpose for building locks in the first place, we have an opportunity to consider whether we still need and want these structures.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which owns and operates the locks, is about to begin studying possibilities for the Lower St. Anthony Falls lock and dam and Lock and Dam 1 (the Ford dam).

Upper St. Anthony Falls has a separate study, primarily because neither the lock or dam is being considered for removal, while the other two are. Here's why.

What's a disposition study?

The first step the Corps takes to examine the future of locks and dams is called a disposition study, which is an official process to examine the costs and benefits of federal projects no longer serving their authorized purpose.

The disposition study will look at different potential future scenarios for the locks and dams and attempt to weigh the costs and benefits of each by the Corps' criteria.  

The Corps' primary consideration in a disposition study is the Corps budget and the financial costs and benefits to the Corps of different scenarios. The Corps also considers community will and environmental outcomes.

Once the Corps completes its study and issues recommendations about what should happen to the locks and dams, it's up to Congress to approve and fund any changes to the structures, their operations or their ownership. 

Possible scenarios for two Twin Cities locks and dams

Broadly speaking, there are a few potential options that the Corps will consider in the disposition study for Lower St. Anthony Falls lock and dam and Lock and Dam 1.

Two dams

The Corps will study the possibility of removal for Lower St. Anthony Falls lock and dam (top) and Lock and Dam 1, or the Ford dam (bottom). Their study about the Upper St. Anthony Falls lock has a different timeline and scope. (Photos by Mike Durenberger, David Wheaton)

Staying the course

The Corps could continue to own, operate and maintain each structure as-is. The Corps has told us that this isn't the most likely outcome because this route costs the Corps money without providing any benefit to the Corps.

Lock and dam removal

The Corps will also study what it would cost the agency to remove the locks and dams and what the consequences of their removal would be for the community and the environment. For the Corps to pursue this option, it would have to find that the cost of removing the structures is less than the cost to the agency of keeping them in place.

A new owner (or owners)

The Corps could find that it's most cost-effective for the Corps to transfer or sell the locks and dams to another owner. Potential owners could include a corporation, nonprofit or trust, or another government entity. That owner could choose to keep the structures in place or attempt to remove them. If no party expresses interest in taking ownership of an entire lock and dam structure, the Corps might choose to sell just portions.

The most likely interested owner would be a hydropower operator seeking to continue operating the dams as they are. However, if any part of the structure falls into private ownership, that would reduce the public's influence on their future. So it's important that the question of dam removal be studied thoroughly before allowing a private owner to keep the dams in place.

Another owner might be interested if they want to take ownership for the purpose of removing the locks and dams. There are examples of this across the country involving nonprofits, local governments and tribes. This removal process would still require extensive permitting and environmental review.

Will the study be enough?

The disposition study on its own might not give us as full of a picture as we'd like it to, particularly when it comes to the costs and benefits of dam removal. Friends of the Mississippi River and our partners will likely want additional research, whether that's conducted by the Corps or by other parties, to guide our community's decision-making.

The Corps' disposition study timeline

The Corps' will begin the disposition study for Lower St. Anthony Falls and Lock and Dam 1 this fall.

As of late September, you can submit an online comment to the Corps directly. We set up a page to do that here if you'd like to send in your thoughts or questions.

The Corps also held some in-person public input opportunities to help define the study's scope. We'll hold more this November. Check our events calendar or sign up as a River Guardian, and we'll send you more info about this and other opportunities.

FMR will advocate for the agency's study to include a thorough consideration of dam removal. The Corps will likely release their draft completed study for public comment sometime in 2024.

The study is just an early step in what will likely be a long process. Congressional authorization would be required for any significant changes to lock and dam ownership, modification or removal. Any of these outcomes could also be costly; funds would have to be assembled. And a big step like dam removal might also require further study and community engagement after the Corps' initial study process. Should the dams be slated for removal, it could easily be 10 or even 20 years before structural work begins.

The Mississippi River has also been heavily altered to support human activity and industrial traffic. Removing dams won't return the river to its "natural" state without extensive associated work to restore the shoreline and river bottoms and replace boulders removed from the channel, plus additional work that we may not be able to forecast quite yet.

What about Upper St. Anthony Falls lock?
USAF

Not a candidate for removal, the Upper St. Anthony Falls lock study has already been drafted. (Photo by Tom Reiter)

The Corps is finalizing its disposition study for the Upper St. Anthony Falls lock. (Xcel Energy owns the Upper St. Anthony Falls dam, which is not considering dam removal.) The Corps' draft study, released in February 2021, proposed moving the lock into private ownership, which would threaten the management of the Twin Cities' water supply.

This proposal received significant community opposition from FMR, local government agencies, river and environmental groups, business leaders, and hundreds of individuals. The final report is still pending; we hope it will include a Corps commitment to owning, managing and maintaining the Upper St. Anthony Falls lock.

Learn more and get involved

This process will unfold over many years, and FMR will be involved every step of the way.

We'll host a variety of workshops, tours and events about the future of Twin Cities locks and dams in the coming years. We're also happy to give special presentations to community groups upon request. And we'll be sure to tell our advocates about ways to weigh in and shape the future of our metro river.

Learn about Twin Cities locks and dams, the pros and cons of removal and more here. For additional details, contact FMR Land Use & Planning Program Director Colleen O'Connor Toberman, ctoberman@fmr.org, 651.222.2193 x29. The best way to keep up with the latest news and hear about opportunities to get involved is to sign up as an FMR River Guardian below.

Become a River Guardian

Sign up and we'll email you when important river issues arise. We make it quick and easy to contact decision-makers. River Guardians are also invited to special social hours and other events about legislative and metro river corridor issues.

Learn about lock and dam removal in the Twin Cities
Meet our Twin Cities locks and dams

See a map of our three Twin Cities locks and dams, a timeline of when and why they were built, and find out why we may not need them anymore.

​​​​​​​The case for and against lock and dam removal

Removing two metro locks and dams would reconnect 39 miles of river through the Mississippi's only gorge, which is located right here in the heart of the Twin Cities. But is dam removal the best scenario for our metro river? Here's what we need to consider.

Read the latest updates on the future of Twin Cities locks and dams

To keep up with the latest developments around this process, check out our most recent articles on locks and dams.

Educators — we’re here for you.

We provide tools and programs for youth educators year-round.