Safeguarding the Clean Water Fund
The Clean Water, Land & Legacy fund is critical to protecting and restoring Minnesota's natural resources, including streams like these. (Photo by FMR)
In 2008, a strong majority of Minnesotans voted to adopt the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment. One-third of the state sales tax revenue derived through this Legacy Amendment is invested in clean water projects via the Clean Water Fund — the only environmental fund in Minnesota dedicated solely to reducing pollution and protecting clean water.
The health of the Mississippi River depends upon the health of the hundreds of tributaries that feed it. The cleaner we can make these streams, creeks, rivers, lakes and ponds, the better the Mighty Mississippi will fare.
The Clean Water Fund is pivotal to this.
Every two years, Minnesota's nonpartisan Clean Water Council works with experts from across the state to craft detailed recommendations to the Legislature on how to best invest Clean Water Fund dollars.
Take action: Tell lawmakers to support Clean Water Fund recommendations
Lawmakers dealing with a budget crunch often look to the Clean Water Fund to pay for projects that should be funded through other means. With the current financial forecast — a shrinking projected surplus for 2026-27, followed by a mutibillion-dollar deficit in the years after — the Clean Water Fund could, unfortunately, become a target this session.
Regardless of the budget forecast, it is vital that legislators follow the recommendations of Minnesota’s non-partisan Clean Water Council for how best to spend the Clean Water Fund.
Use the form below to send a message to your state representatives and senator. Urge them to stick to the thorough, thoughtful work of the council and support the revised FY26-27 Clean Water Fund recommendations.
The integrity of the Clean Water Fund
It is vitally important that Clean Water Fund dollars are spent wisely. In general, we support investments that:
- Invest in programs vs pork: Funds should remain program-based (e.g. for our statewide strategic stream monitoring program) rather than picking specific "pet projects" (e.g. extra monitoring in a specific legislative district).
- Avoid substitution: Clean Water Fund dollars can't be used as a substitute for traditional funding sources. These funds must be “over and above” traditional funding levels.
- Catalyze system change: Small investments can make big impacts over time. Investments in programs such as Forever Green can lead to landscape-level transformation — the kind of change we need to achieve our clean water goals.
Advocating for the council's recommendations
FMR deeply appreciates the Clean Water Council's work to pursue an inclusive and transparent process by soliciting public input throughout the Clean Water Fund recommendation process. While we don’t always agree with 100% of the council’s recommendations, we generally support them and believe that the council’s process produces the best possible suite of recommendations for Minnesota.
However, there are cases where we may object to specific line items in Council’s recommendations on constitutional grounds. In the rare case where we feel specific items are better funded through traditional means rather than the Clean Water Fund, we will make that known to decision-makers.
FMR always looks forward to working with lawmakers in both parties to ensure all constitutional recommendations are reflected in the Legislature's final appropriations.
Become a River Guardian
Sign up and we'll email you when important river issues arise. We make it quick and easy to contact decision-makers. River Guardians are also invited to special social hours and other events about legislative and metro river corridor issues.